So a nazi should have the freedom to try and convince other ppl that it would be a good idea to gas a subsection of society, right, since it’s just an idea he likes to discuss?
And a pedophile should have the freedom to discuss with an underage person how it would be a good idea to go somewhere together at night to discuss things in private, right, since it’s just an idea he’d like to discuss?
Do you not understand how that doesn’t work? Do i rly have to spell these things out for u?
There is literally no way someone can sincerely hold on to this view unless they’re to stubborn and proud to admit that indeed there’s a problem there, or indeed, they simply lack the means of understanding these issues properly.
That’s why there can never be “absolute freedom” of speech or of anything rly. There must be boundaries that are upheld for the common good, and indeed, if there are to be boundaries, then those boundaries must be determined by someone eventually, whether u like it or not.
These simple examples also demonstrate the problem with “absolute freedom” and “limitless democracy” btw. You see, once 51% of the population become nazis or don’t mind it because u let them infect the others, or once 51% become pedophiles or don’t mind it, or once 51% become cannibals, or don’t mind the idea, the shit hits the fan, because guess what, everyone else is now on the menu.
And if u wanna claim that these are insane examples, well, just ask Hitler about that, will u, or maybe you’ve already forgotten what happened not even a century ago in a democratic country, and it was all done through “legal” means.